The biggest surprise of Sight and Sound’s 2012 poll, other than Vertigo dethroning Citizen Kane for the top slot, was the inclusion of Dziga Vertov’s 1929 movie Man with a Movie Camera, an experimental feature length film, at eighth place, ahead of The Passion of Joan of Arc and after The Searchers. Some may cry blasphemy at the picture’s inclusion, but I found Man with a Movie Camera‘s high ranking to be completely deserved. It’s an enthralling movie with a truly visionary standpoint.
Man with a Movie Camera opens up with a title telling the audience explicitly that it is an avant-garde film, meaning there will be no intertitles nor did Vertov use any actors or sets. Vertov’s goal was to make a picture that speaks to all people (though there are subtitles translating various Russian texts), an original intention of film itself. There is no direct story in Man with a Movie Camera, though the film often shows the images of the filmmakers as well as a recurring scene in a movie theater. The center of the picture revolves around one day of a Soviet city, filmed in Odessa, Moscow, and Kiev. Vertov filmed over three years of footage and his wife Elizaveta Svilova edited together about 1,775 separate shots. Vertov commonly switches settings over and over. He cuts from factories to dump yards to waterfalls to beaches. Much like Baraka, Man with a Movie Camera is just a symphony to watch the transitions.
Of course, what’s so famous about Man with a Movie Camera is the number of movie techniques it employs. There is stop motion, freeze frames, tracking shots, extreme close-ups, split screens, and Dutch angles. Man with a Movie Camera wasn’t the origin of all these cinematic movements, but it certainly revolutionized it. It’s hard not to see the influence of the film in multiple movies, from Jean-Luc Godard to Martin Scorsese.
I’ll keep this review short, since I would not want to create many preconceived notions and would rather have you experience the film yourself. It’s available on Netflix, accompanied by a score by Michael Nyman, and is only about an hour long, making it a short and easy watch. It’s a miraculous film achievement, one that still seems completely fresh today.
I caught this (on YouTube even, heh) right after that Sight & Sound poll came out; definitely would second the recommendation! The way its edited and structure is basically flawless.
By: davecrewe on September 4, 2013
at 6:07 am
Glad you agree. It’s a movie that’s great to watch unfold.
By: ckckred on September 4, 2013
at 5:33 pm
Interesting, man. Very interesting. I must see this.
By: Mark Walker on September 4, 2013
at 9:10 am
Thanks! I think you’ll like it. I know you enjoyed Baraka and this is much like that.
By: ckckred on September 4, 2013
at 5:33 pm
That sounds even better! Have you seen Samsara as well? I’m dying to get hold of that.
By: Mark Walker on September 4, 2013
at 5:43 pm
I haven’t seen it yet, but I have that on store in my Netflix queue, so I’ll probably watch it this weekend. I’m a big fan of experimental cinema.
By: ckckred on September 4, 2013
at 5:53 pm
Remember trying to watch this a few years but wasn’t in the right frame of mind at the time. Need to revisit it to give it a proper chance.
By: Three Rows Back on September 4, 2013
at 11:00 am
Thanks for the comment. Try giving it another shot. I watched it again afterwards and loved it even more a second time.
By: ckckred on September 4, 2013
at 5:34 pm
Thanks, enjoyed this. Think I might actually give it a go on Netflix tonight, I’m in the mood for something a bit different. Sounds fascinating and I’ve heard so much about it. The Cinematic Orchestra (a UK band) released a new soundtrack to it 10 years or so ago – I have that record but have never seen the movie.
By: Popcorn Nights on October 9, 2013
at 1:11 pm
Thanks! It’s a great movie and I would like to listen to the Cinematic Orchestra’s score to it.
By: ckckred on October 9, 2013
at 4:32 pm